<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Magnitude of an Effective Website	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.designtorontoweb.ca/effective-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.designtorontoweb.ca/effective-website/</link>
	<description>Strategic Web Design &#38; Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 06:04:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: yes, write my paper		</title>
		<link>https://www.designtorontoweb.ca/effective-website/#comment-321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yes, write my paper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 14:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://stg.designtorontoweb.ca/blog/?p=760#comment-321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is very important to use examples in a philosophy paper. Many of the claims philosophers make are very abstract and hard to understand, and examples are the best way to make those claims clearer.

Examples are also useful for explaining the notions that play a central role in your argument. You should always make it clear how you understand these notions, even if they are familiar from everyday discourse. As they&#039;re used in everyday discourse, those notions may not have a sufficiently clear or precise meaning. For instance, suppose you&#039;re writing a paper about abortion, and you want to assert the claim &quot;A fetus is a person.&quot; What do you mean by &quot;a person&quot;? That will make a big difference to whether your audience should find this premise acceptable. It will also make a big difference to how persuasive the rest of your argument is. By itself, the following argument is pretty worthless:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very important to use examples in a philosophy paper. Many of the claims philosophers make are very abstract and hard to understand, and examples are the best way to make those claims clearer.</p>
<p>Examples are also useful for explaining the notions that play a central role in your argument. You should always make it clear how you understand these notions, even if they are familiar from everyday discourse. As they&#8217;re used in everyday discourse, those notions may not have a sufficiently clear or precise meaning. For instance, suppose you&#8217;re writing a paper about abortion, and you want to assert the claim &#8220;A fetus is a person.&#8221; What do you mean by &#8220;a person&#8221;? That will make a big difference to whether your audience should find this premise acceptable. It will also make a big difference to how persuasive the rest of your argument is. By itself, the following argument is pretty worthless:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Lee		</title>
		<link>https://www.designtorontoweb.ca/effective-website/#comment-320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 13:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://stg.designtorontoweb.ca/blog/?p=760#comment-320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice information Online presence becoming most challenging part for everyone. It is necessary  to represent  Online presence.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice information Online presence becoming most challenging part for everyone. It is necessary  to represent  Online presence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
